What evidence should social policymakers use?

Andrew Leigh

Economic Roundup, 2009, issue 1, 27-43

Abstract: Policymakers seeking empirical evidence on social policy interventions often find themselves confronted with a mountain of academic studies that are potentially relevant to the question. Without some systematic way to sort through the evidence, there is a risk that analysts will become mired in the research, or simply cherry-pick those studies that support their prior beliefs. An alternative approach is to test each study against a hierarchy of research methods. This article discusses two hierarchies — one used by US medical researchers, and another used by UK social policymakers — and suggests one possible hierarchy for Australia. Naturally, such a hierarchy should not be the only tool used to assess research, and should be used in conjunction with other factors, such as the ranking of the journal in which a study is published. But used carefully, a hierarchy can help policymakers sort through a daunting body of research, and may also inform governments’ decisions on how to evaluate social policy interventions.

Keywords: policy-making; social welfare (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B4 H00 I3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.treasury.gov.au/PublicationsAndMedia/Pu ... omic-Roundup-Issue-1 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tsy:journl:journl_tsy_er_2009_1_3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economic Roundup from The Treasury, Australian Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The Treasury (Commonwealth of Australia) ().