Second Trimester Sunlight and Asthma: Evidence from Two Independent Studies
David Slusky and
Richard Zeckhauser ()
Additional contact information
Nils Wernerfelt: Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
American Journal of Health Economics, 2017, vol. 3, issue 2, 227-253
One in 12 Americans suffers from asthma, and its annual costs are estimated to exceed $50 billion. Yet the root causes of the disease remain unknown. A recent hypothesis posits that maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy affect the probability the fetus later develops asthma. Employing two large-scale studies, we test this hypothesis using a natural experiment afforded by historical variation in sunlight, a major source of vitamin D. Specifically, holding the birth location and month fixed, we see how exogenous within-location variation in sunlight across birth years affects the probability of asthma onset. We show that this measurement of sunlight correlates with actual exposure, and consistent with preexisting results from the fetal development literature, we find substantial and highly significant evidence in both data sets that increased sunlight during the second trimester lowers the subsequent probability of asthma. Our results suggest policies designed to augment vitamin D levels in pregnant women, the large majority of whom are vitamin D insufficient, could be very cost effective and yield a substantial surplus.
Keywords: asthma; sunlight; vitamin D; natural experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I12 I18 J13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
Journal Article: Second Trimester Sunlight and Asthma: Evidence from Two Independent Studies (2017)
Working Paper: Second Trimester Sunlight and Asthma: Evidence from Two Indpendent Studies (2014)
Working Paper: Second Trimester Sunlight and Asthma: Evidence from Two Independent Studies (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:amjhec:v:3:y:2017:i:2:p:227-253
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in American Journal of Health Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().