Monetary Incentives and Student Achievement in a Depressed Labor Market: Results from a Randomized Experiment

Maria De Paola (), Vincenzo Scoppa () and Rosanna Nisticò

Journal of Human Capital, 2012, vol. 6, issue 1, 56 - 85

Abstract: We evaluate the effectiveness of monetary incentives in enhancing student performance using a randomized experiment involving undergraduate students enrolled at a southern Italian University. Students were assigned to three different groups: a high-reward group, a low-reward group, and a control group. Rewards were given to the 30 best-performing students in each group. Financial rewards increase student performance. High-ability students react strongly whereas the effect is null for low-ability students. Large and small rewards produce very similar effects. These effects also persist in subsequent years, when the financial incentives are no longer in place. No types of crowding-out effects of the monetary incentives are found.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (38)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664795 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664795 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Monetary Incentives and Student Achievement in a Depressed Labor Market: Results from a Randomized Experiment (2012)
Working Paper: MONETARY INCENTIVES AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN A DEPRESSED LABOUR MARKET: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jhucap:doi:10.1086/664795

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Human Capital from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().