Monetary Incentives and Student Achievement in a Depressed Labor Market: Results from a Randomized Experiment
Maria De Paola (),
Vincenzo Scoppa () and
Journal of Human Capital, 2012, vol. 6, issue 1, 56 - 85
We evaluate the effectiveness of monetary incentives in enhancing student performance using a randomized experiment involving undergraduate students enrolled at a southern Italian University. Students were assigned to three different groups: a high-reward group, a low-reward group, and a control group. Rewards were given to the 30 best-performing students in each group. Financial rewards increase student performance. High-ability students react strongly whereas the effect is null for low-ability students. Large and small rewards produce very similar effects. These effects also persist in subsequent years, when the financial incentives are no longer in place. No types of crowding-out effects of the monetary incentives are found.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
Working Paper: Monetary Incentives and Student Achievement in a Depressed Labor Market: Results from a Randomized Experiment (2012)
Working Paper: MONETARY INCENTIVES AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN A DEPRESSED LABOUR MARKET: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jhucap:doi:10.1086/664795
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Human Capital from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().