Understanding Wage Growth: Estimating and Testing Learning-by-Doing
Journal of Human Capital, 2017, vol. 11, issue 2, 213 - 246
I adapt the basic insight from the literature that tests the permanent-income theory to test the learning-by-doing (LBD) model of human capital accumulation. I propose three measures of workers’ incentives to accumulate skills. These incentives correlate with wage growth conditional on hours worked and past wages, implying that significant components of wage growth are not accounted for by the LBD model. This suggests that wage growth is costly and that workers face a trade-off between current and future earnings. This trade-off has ramifications for wage subsidy policies and for understanding women’s decisions about children and career.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jhucap:doi:10.1086/691699
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Human Capital from University of Chicago Press
Series data maintained by Journals Division ().