Industrial Policy Cuts Two Ways: Evidence from Cotton-Spinning Firms in Japan, 1956-1964

Kozo Kiyota and Tetsuji Okazaki

Journal of Law and Economics, 2010, vol. 53, issue 3, 587 - 609

Abstract: A number of studies have revealed a negative effect of industrial policy on productivity growth. Is this because industrial policy fails to control the activities of firms or because it can effectively control them? This paper attempts to answer these questions, using firm-level data from the cotton-spinning industry in Japan for the period 1956-64. We determine that industrial policy cut two ways during this period. Industrial policy effectively controlled the output of cotton-spinning firms, which contributed to the establishment of a stable market structure during the period. On the flip side, such policy constrained the reallocation of resources from less productive large firms to more productive small firms. Combined with the negative productivity growth in large firms during this period, industrial policy resulted in negative productivity growth in the industry.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605129 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605129 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Industrial Policy Cuts Two Ways: Evidence from Cotton Spinning Firms in Japan, 1956-1964 (2009)
Working Paper: Industrial Policy Cuts Two Ways: Evidence from Cotton Spinning Firms in Japan, 1956-1964 (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/605129

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().