EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Vertical Integration during the Hollywood Studio Era

F. Andrew Hanssen ()

Journal of Law and Economics, 2010, vol. 53, issue 3, 519 - 543

Abstract: The Hollywood studio system--production, distribution, and exhibition vertically integrated--flourished until 1948, when the famous Paramount decision forced the divestiture of theater chains and the abandonment of a number of vertical practices. Although many of the banned practices have since been posited to have increased efficiency, evidence of an efficiency-enhancing rationale for theater ownership has not been presented. This paper explores the hypothesis that theater chain ownership promoted efficient ex post adjustment in the length of film runs--specifically, abbreviation of unexpectedly unpopular films. Extracontractual run-length adjustments are desirable because demand for a film is not revealed until the film is actually exhibited. The paper employs a unique data set of cinema booking sheets. It finds that run lengths for releases by vertically integrated film producers were significantly--economically and statistically--more likely to be altered ex post. The paper documents and discusses additional practices intended to promote flexibility.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605567 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605567 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/605567

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/605567