Consumer Welfare and the Legacy of Robert Bork

Kenneth Heyer

Journal of Law and Economics, 2014, vol. 57, issue S3, S19 - S32

Abstract: Writing 35 years ago in The Antitrust Paradox, Robert Bork observed, "Antitrust policy cannot be made rational until we are able to give a firm answer to one question: What is the point of the law--what are its goals?" Bork proposed what he called a consumer-welfare standard, though it is what we today call a total-welfare standard. Interestingly, many of the arguments Bork offered in defense of the latter apply also to the former. Bork defended his proposed standard less on the support that it finds in economics and more on his reading of legislative intent. Although Bork's antitrust analysis drew largely on basic microeconomic theory, he believed that economists and courts were incapable of estimating competitive effects. He therefore favored bright-line rules for, particularly, proposed mergers. Whatever else one thinks of Bork, on the critical question of antitrust's fundamental purpose, his views have in large measure prevailed.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676463 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676463 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/676463

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().