The Economics of the Right to Be Forgotten

Byung-Cheol Kim and Jin Yeub Kim

Journal of Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 60, issue 2, 335 - 360

Abstract: Scholars and practitioners debate whether to expand the scope of the right to be forgotten--the right to have certain links removed from search results--to encompass global search results. The debate centers on the assumption that the expansion will increase the incidence of link removal, which reinforces privacy while hampering free speech. We develop a game-theoretic model to show that the expansion of the right to be forgotten can reduce the incidence of link removal. We also show that the expansion does not necessarily enhance the welfare of individuals who request removal and that it can either improve or reduce societal welfare. Our analysis has implications for understanding the impact of the global expansion of the right to be forgotten on privacy and free speech.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694254 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694254 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Economics of the Right to be Forgotten (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/694254

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().