EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Whistle-Blowers on the Board? The Role of Independent Directors in Cartel Prosecutions

Murillo Campello, Daniel Ferres and Gaizka Ormazabal

Journal of Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 60, issue 2, 241 - 268

Abstract: Market reactions to news of cartel prosecutions are muted when indicted firms have a high proportion of independent directors on their boards. Independent directors serving on cartel-indicted firms are penalized by losing board seats and vote support at other firms where they serve. Notably, firms with more independent directors are more likely to cooperate with prosecutors through leniency programs. They are also more likely to dismiss chief executive officers after cartel indictments. Our study shows that cartel prosecution imposes significant, market-based personal costs on independent directors and that they take actions to mitigate those costs. Crompton is a prime example of a company whose independent board of directors decided to leave no stone unturned in its commitment to investigate, identify and report antitrust violations…. [T]he board's strategy resulted in the company receiving an extraordinary reduction in its rubber chemicals fine…. Crompton's early cooperation allowed the Division to conserve and focus its resources and to immediately put additional pressure on other subject companies and individuals to cooperate. (Hammond 2006)

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694826 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694826 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Whistleblowers on the Board? The Role of Independent Directors in Cartel Prosecutions (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/694826

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:doi:10.1086/694826