Shareholder Liability Regimes, Principal-Agent Relationships, and Banking Industry Performance

Lewis Evans and Neil C Quigley

Journal of Law and Economics, 1995, vol. 38, issue 2, 497-520

Abstract: We develop an interpretation of the economics of alternative shareholder liability regimes that challenges the view that limited liability always represents the most efficient form of corporate organization. Unlimited liability will prevail when creditors are willing to compensate shareholders for bearing all of the costs of monitoring management and the risk associated with the activities of the firm. When the information about the financial position of the firm that is required to facilitate increased risk-bearing by creditors can be provided at costs lower than those associated with unlimited liability, firms will incorporate. Scottish banking in the nineteenth century provides unique data on the operation of a market in which firms with limited and unlimited liability competed, on the risk premium associated with unlimited liability shares, and on the innovations in information provision that facilitated the move from unlimited to multiple liability. Copyright 1995 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467340 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:38:y:1995:i:2:p:497-520

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().