The Fable of the Bees Revisited: Causes and Consequences of the U.S. Honey Program

Mary K Muth, Randal R Rucker, Walter Thurman and Ching-Ta Chuang

Journal of Law and Economics, 2003, vol. 46, issue 2, 479-516

Abstract: In his 1973 paper, Steven Cheung discredited the "fable of the bees" by demonstrating that markets for beekeeping services exist and function well. Although economists heeded Cheung's lessons, policy makers did not. The honey program has operated for over 50 years, supporting the price of honey through a variety of mechanisms. Its effects were minor before the 1980s but then became important, with annual government expenditures near $100 million for several years. Reforms of the program in the late 1980s reduced its market effects and budget costs, returning it to its original role as a minor commodity program. Although the 1996 Farm Bill formally eliminated the honey program, it was reinstated in the 2002 Farm Bill. We measure the historical welfare effects of the program during its various incarnations, examine its frequently stated public interest rationale--the encouragement of honeybee pollination--and interpret its history in light of economic theories of regulation.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/377290 (application/pdf)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: THE FABLE OF THE BEES REVISITED: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE U.S. HONEY PROGRAM (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlawec:y:2003:v:46:i:2:p:479-516

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Law and Economics from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().