Development District Bond Financings: The Good and the Bad

Nathan S. Betnun

Municipal Finance Journal, 2014, vol. 35, issue 1, 45 - 60

Abstract: Since 2000, municipalities have used more than $55 billion of development district bonds to finance infrastructure for new development, including more than 2,000 landsecured special tax bonds totaling $27 billion and 1,300 TIF bond issues totaling $28 billion. As of January 1, 2014, 31% (by dollar volume) of land-secured bonds issued in Florida since 2000 and 52% of these bonds in four adjoining states were in payment default. For the other 45 states, the combined incidence of default was 2.4%, including 0.5% in California, where the majority of these bonds were issued. Two key differences relate to the nature of the issuers and to appraisal standards. The overall incidence of default on TIF bonds was 0.9%. California, which had accounted for 67% of TIF volume, recently abolished the agencies authorized to issue these bonds to save the state from the cost of backfilling lost local tax revenues, a cost not covered by most other states. Other than for California TIF bonds, the volume of development district bonds is expected to increase in the coming years.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ35010045 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/MFJ35010045 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:munifj:doi:10.1086/mfj35010045

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Municipal Finance Journal from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().