Benefit–Cost Analysis of Government Spending

Zachary Liscow

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2025, vol. 19, issue 2, 221 - 228

Abstract: This article applies economic theory to the benefit–cost analysis (BCA) of government spending. It describes overlooked contrasts between how BCA should be performed for spending versus regulation in practice. It is motivated by the recent revisions to US government guidance on BCA for spending and expansions of the funds covered by these rules. The article covers the discount rate, the costs of performing BCAs, the use of benefit–cost ratios versus net benefits, distributional analysis, the marginal cost of public funds, and public disclosure. It also discusses some challenges for the future given on-the-ground realities.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735768 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/735768 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/735768

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().