An Emissions Assurance Mechanism: Adding Environmental Certainty to a U.S. Carbon Tax
Gilbert Metcalf
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2020, vol. 14, issue 1, 114 - 130
Abstract:
Economists have long favored a carbon tax as the most efficient policy to curb greenhouse gas emissions. One barrier to broader support for this policy option is its failure to ensure limits on emissions. Environmental groups, in particular, have expressed skepticism about carbon taxes for this failure to explicitly limit emissions. In response, policymakers have shown interest in a hybrid carbon tax that provides some assurance that emissions reduction targets will be met. To demonstrate how such a hybrid tax could work, I propose a prototype emissions assurance mechanism (EAM) that is practical, simple to implement, and easily understood. This EAM would be aimed at achieving a 45 percent reduction in energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, relative to 2005 emissions, by 2035. This would put the United States on track for deep emissions reductions by mid-century. More specifically, the EAM would track actual emissions in each year relative to an emissions pathway. If cumulative emissions exceeded benchmarks along the pathway, then the tax rate would increase annually more rapidly at a rate established in the initial legislation. The emissions pathway is a policy choice that determines desired emission reductions; I suggest that the pathway and EAM be built into carbon tax legislation.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez013 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez013 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1093/reep/rez013
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().