Empirical Copyright: A Case Study of File Sharing, Sales Revenue, and Music Output
Glynn S. Lunney
Supreme Court Economic Review, 2016, vol. 24, issue 1, 261 - 322
Abstract:
A simple intuition justifies copyright: more revenue means more original works. In this article, I test that intuition by examining how the rise of file sharing, and the contemporaneous decline in record sales, affected music output. Using the appearance of new artists and new songs on the Billboard Hot 100 chart as a measure of music output, I show that the decline in sales was associated, ceteris paribus, with (i) fewer new artists but (ii) more hit songs by each new artist. Because the second effect outweighed the first, the rise of file sharing and the contemporaneous decline in record sales was associated with a net increase in the production of new hit songs.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/695561 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/695561 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/695561
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Supreme Court Economic Review from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().