EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Property Relations Reformation In Forest Management Field: Priorities And Restrictions

Anatoliy Karpuk
Additional contact information
Anatoliy Karpuk: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, 2014, issue 2, 37-40

Abstract: We consider the ownership of forest resources and forest lands, regulated by national regulatory and legal framework. The most resonant issues of reform of forest property are the possibility of institutionalization of private ownership and the transfer of some forest land in communal ownership. Forcing the process of creating communal forest ownership is appropriate, when they removed all the controversy concerning the delimitation of land within and outside the settlements, and when local communities will have broader powers to local budget revenues and be able to make deals with the subjects of forestry businesses capable of augmenting forest potential settlements and surrounding areas. It is necessary to significantly diversify the temporary use of forests to enhance entrepreneurial activity in the harvesting and primary processing of wood. In view of this it is necessary to legitimize the possibility of implementation in practice of forest management lease schemes of concession regime, production sharing agreements and asset management.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:2:p:37-40

Access Statistics for this article

Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist is currently edited by Vadym Bardas'

More articles in Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist from Yuriy Kovalenko
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vadym Bardas' ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:2:p:37-40