Struktur Pembiayaan dan Risiko Kecairan: Analisis Perbankan Islam Domestik dan Asing di Malaysia

Noraini Mat Yaakub (), Aisyah Rahman () and Ahmad Azam Sulaiman ()
Additional contact information
Noraini Mat Yaakub: Fakulti Ekonomi dan Pengurusan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 UKM Bangi Selangor MALAYSIA
Aisyah Rahman: Fakulti Ekonomi dan Pengurusan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 UKM Bangi Selangor MALAYSIA
Ahmad Azam Sulaiman: Jabatan Syariah dan Ekonomi Akademi Pengajian Islam Universiti Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur MALAYSIA

Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 2017, vol. 51, issue 2, 115-130

Abstract: Liquidity risk stems from the failure of a bank to meet the demand from the bank’s liability to customer at an affordable cost in times of need. It may lead to bank insolvency and could affect the stability of the financial system. The failure of banks to effectively manage the financing structure may increase default risk and eventually liquidity risk. This study investigates and compares the financing structure-liquidity risk relationships between the Malaysian domestic and foreign Islamic banks. We adopt two measures of liquidity risk, namely; liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR). While LCR is a short-run measure of liquidity risk (30 days), NSFR is a longer term measure of liquidity risk (one year). For financing structure, we use four measures, namely real estate financing, specialization index (SPEC), and the stability of short-term (LCC) and long-term financing structure (VART).By using static panel regression of 10 domestic and seven foreign Islamic banks for the period of 1994-2014, the results show that financing structure of domestic Islamic banks have significant positive relationship with LCR. Specifically, by increasing financing to property sector as well as stability of short-term financing structure (LCC), the domestic Islamic banks are exposed to short-term liquidity risk (LCR). However, there is an inverse relationships with NFSR for the case of foreign Islamic banks, inferring that by increasing financing to property sector leads to decreasing longer term foreign Islamic banks’ liquidity risk (NSFR). These contradicting results could be due to the prudent strategy by foreign Islamic banks in providing financing to less risky clients. It is crucial for policy makers at macro and micro levels to consider the behavior of financing structure in improving liquidity risk management framework for Islamic banks. In addition, by looking at the trend of a bank’s financing structure, investors and customers can have a picture of a bank’s liquidity risk, thus helping them to make investment and saving decisions.

Keywords: Islamic banks; financing structure; liquidity risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ukm.my/jem/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/jeko_512-10.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:51:y:2017:i:2:p:115-130

DOI: 10.17576/JEM-2017-5001-10

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia from Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Muhammad Asri Abd Ghani ().