EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Decision making models in politics: harmony and conflict, and allocation in economics: markets and hierarchy. Elements for a debate

Douglas C. Ramírez Vera ()
Additional contact information
Douglas C. Ramírez Vera: Universidad de Los Andes. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales.

Economía, 2003, vol. 28-29, issue 19-20, 87-108

Abstract: This paper shows the relationships between the mechanisms of decision in politics (harmony versus conflict) and the mechanisms of allocation in economics (hierarchy versus market) by means of ideal types. Under this approach one concludes that the market mechanism in economics and the conflict mechanism in politics are more suitable for the constitution of a modern society, with a democratic, social, and decentralized state of right.

Keywords: institutions; market mechanisms; economic models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
ftp://iies.faces.ula.ve/Pdf/Revista19-20/Rev19-20Ramirez.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ula:econom:v:28-29:y:2003-2004:i:19-20:p:87-108

Access Statistics for this article

Economía is currently edited by Dyanna María Ruíz Uzcátegui and Yibeli Emilia Briceño Carrero

More articles in Economía from Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (IIES). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida, Venezuela Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales. Campus Universitario Liria, Edificio G, Tercer Nivel. Mérida 5101, Estado Mérida, Venezuela. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alexis Vásquez ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:ula:econom:v:28-29:y:2003-2004:i:19-20:p:87-108