Junk journals: Scientometrics vs Science

Evgeny N. Smirnov and Sergey A. Lukyanov
Additional contact information
Evgeny N. Smirnov: State University of Management, Moscow, Russia
Sergey A. Lukyanov: State University of Management, Moscow, Russia; MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia

Upravlenets, 2022, vol. 13, issue 4, 83–95

Abstract: The social organization of the Russian scientific community is such that many established ethical standards conflict with the real research practice. Using exclusively scientometric approaches to assessing scientific achievements leads to the fact that the quantitative indicators of this assessment prevail over the true results of research activity. The paper aims to reveal organizational problems associated with the interaction with junk journals that result in ‘clogging’ and ‘emptying’ objective scientific knowledge about the modern world. The theoretical basis of the study includes scientometric approaches to evaluating publication activity. Statistical methods were used to analyse the development and spread of unscrupulous journals and junk scientific conferences; the methods of expert assessments and content analysis were also applied. The information base is the corpus of leading Russian and foreign researchers’ works on scientometric evaluation of publications and the use of special methods of bibliometric analysis. The multiplicity of fraud issues in science still unresolved and the palliative measures taken make it possible to assess the harmfulness of scientometric formalism from a new perspective. The main features of junk journals are identified: lack of peer review, international collaboration and target audience; multidisciplinarity; demand-based journal volumes; a short publication cycle, etc. In the article, we assess the dynamics and spread of such journals in Russian science, identify effective measures to counteract law-quality publications, such as retraction and a combination of altmetric and bibliometric methods for evaluating studies. Another focus of analysis is to describe the practice of junk conferences and provide criteria for their identification.

Keywords: scientometrics; junk journals; international scientometric database; impact factor; plagiarism; scientific conferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I2 O17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/98/7.pdf (application/pdf)
https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/component/content/article/1091 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:4:p:83-95

DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-4-7

Access Statistics for this article

Upravlenets is currently edited by Yulia S. Bausova

More articles in Upravlenets from Ural State University of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Blaginin ().