Whether academic and teaching staff are universal
Anna V. Gozalova,
Viktoriya S. Ryzhova and
Lyudmila S. Skachkova
Additional contact information
Anna V. Gozalova: Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Viktoriya S. Ryzhova: Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Lyudmila S. Skachkova: Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Upravlenets, 2022, vol. 13, issue 5, 85-101
Abstract:
Academic personnel routinely carry out a wide range of teaching, research, administrative, and expert functions. However, many of them do not focus on universality, but in fact specialize in performing one or several academic functions (profiles). The article deals with the discrepancy between the traditional distribution of professional duties of academic and teaching staff (ATS) and their actual performance. The research methodology is based on the positive agency theory, which allows explaining the peculiarities of social and labour relations in the academic sphere. The research methods of descriptive, frequency and regression analysis are used, including the method of logistic regression. The empirical basis includes the results of a survey conducted in 2022 of 207 academic and teaching staff members of the Southern Federal University, Russia. The questionnaire was compiled of the aspects of academic, teaching, expert and administrative profiles, as well as the questions about the socio-economic characteristics of respondents, the professional role they prefer, labour productivity and salary satisfaction. The results of studying the structure and the ATS’s choice of professional roles (profiles) can be used to solve problems in the field of social and labour relations at the university. According to the findings, the share of employees choosing specialization and the share of ‘universal’ employees were distributed equally; a discrepancy was found between respondents’ preference for performing one or another function and the actual work they do in the academic field. It was revealed that the specialization of work in a certain profile has a significant impact on labour productivity, and an increase in the number of work profiles reduces the likelihood of being in a group of employees satisfied with the correlation between their salary and the volume and complexity of the work performed.
Keywords: professional roles; social and labour relations; unobservable behaviour; managerialism; positive agency theory; academia; contracts. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 J53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/99/6.pdf (application/pdf)
https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2022/1140 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:85-101
DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-5-6
Access Statistics for this article
Upravlenets is currently edited by Yulia S. Bausova
More articles in Upravlenets from Ural State University of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Victor Blaginin ().