EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

France and Germany Nuclear Energy Policies Revisited: A Veblenian Appraisal

Pascal Petit ()

Panoeconomicus, 2013, vol. 60, issue 5, 687-698

Abstract: Nuclear energy policy should have been a major area of cooperation for France and Germany, playing a lead role in the energy policy of the EU. Yet they have retained different options, especially regarding nuclear energy while the EU energy policy remained very indicative. These two “coordinated economies” should have been able to cooperate more closely on this issue. While the reasons for this difference in behavior have much to do with the specificities of the nuclear energy, they are more precisely related to the continuously rising level of security requirements, a learning process in which the magnitude of risks and time lengths appeared, even before Fukushima, to go beyond rational boundaries on which cooperation (as well as market) ventures could be based. This raises the issue in the present state of the technologies of the possibility of an international governance of this nuclear industry. Key words: Nuclear energy, Coordinated economy, European Union, Energy transition.JEL: N70.

Keywords: Nuclear energy; Coordinated economy; European Union; Energy transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/91/448 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:voj:journl:v:60:y:2013:i:5:p:687-698:id:91

Access Statistics for this article

Panoeconomicus is currently edited by Kosta Josifidis

More articles in Panoeconomicus from Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:60:y:2013:i:5:p:687-698:id:91