Infrastructure, Human Capital Development and Economic Growth in Transitional Countries
Tsaurai Kunofiwa () and
Adam Ndou
Additional contact information
Tsaurai Kunofiwa: Ph.D., Associate Professor at the University of South Africa, Department of Finance, Risk Management and Banking, Pretoria, South Africa; kunofiwa.tsaurai@gmail.com
Comparative Economic Research, 2019, vol. 22, issue 1, 33-52
Abstract:
This study investigated the impact of infrastructure and human capital development on economic growth in transitional economies. It also explored whether the interaction between infrastructural and human capital development enhanced economic growth in the transitional economies. Although the literature is awash with studies which investigated the separate impact of infrastructure and human capital development on economic growth, no study that the author is aware of has so far explored whether the interaction between infrastructure and human capital development enhances economic growth. The study mainly used a dynamic panel generalised methods of moments (GMM) approach by Arellano and Bond (1995), a framework that takes into account the dynamic nature of economic growth data and addresses the endogeneity issues normally associated with economic growth regression functions. Panel data analysis approaches such as pooled ordinary least squares (OLS), and fixed and random effects were used for comparison purposes and robustness tests. According to the dynamic GMM framework, the interaction between infrastructure and human capital development improved economic growth in transitional economies, in line with theoretical and empirical predictions. Random effects and pooled OLS show that the interaction between infrastructural and human capital development had a deleterious effect on economic growth, whilst according to the fixed effects approach, the interaction between these two variables had an insignificant positive influence on economic growth in transitional economies. Considering that the results from a dynamic panel GMM are considered to be more accurate due to the approach’s ability to address the endogeneity problem and the dynamic nature of economic growth data, the current study recommends that transitional economies should implement policies that improve human capital development in order to enhance infrastructural development’s ability to influence economic growth. Future studies should investigate not just one (human capital development), but all the conditional factors which must be in place before economic growth advantages triggered by infrastructure development are realised.
Keywords: human capital; infrastructure transitional economies; dynamic GMM (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F43 J24 O18 P20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0003 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:coecre:v:22:y:2019:i:1:p:33-52:n:3
DOI: 10.2478/cer-2019-0003
Access Statistics for this article
Comparative Economic Research is currently edited by Zofia Wysokińska
More articles in Comparative Economic Research from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().