Optimizing effective numbers of tests by vine copula modeling
Steffen Nico () and
Thorsten Dickhaus
Additional contact information
Steffen Nico: University of Bremen, Institute for Statistics
Dependence Modeling, 2020, vol. 8, issue 1, 172-185
Abstract:
In the multiple testing context, we utilize vine copulae for optimizing the effective number of tests. It is well known that for the calibration of multiple tests for control of the family-wise error rate the dependencies between the marginal tests are of utmost importance. It has been shown in previous work, that positive dependencies between the marginal tests can be exploited in order to derive a relaxed Šidák-type multiplicity correction. This correction can conveniently be expressed by calculating the corresponding „effective number of tests“ for a given (global) significance level. This methodology can also be applied to blocks of test statistics so that the effective number of tests can be calculated by the sum of the effective numbers of tests for each block. In the present work, we demonstrate how the power of the multiple test can be optimized by taking blocks with high inner-block dependencies. The determination of those blocks will be performed by means of an estimated vine copula model. An algorithm is presented which uses the information of the estimated vine copula to make a data-driven choice of appropriate blocks in terms of (estimated) dependencies. Numerical experiments demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach.
Keywords: Dißmann Algorithm; family-wise error rate; global significance level; Kendall’s τ; local significance levels; multiple testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/demo-2020-0010 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:demode:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:172-185:n:10
DOI: 10.1515/demo-2020-0010
Access Statistics for this article
Dependence Modeling is currently edited by Giovanni Puccetti
More articles in Dependence Modeling from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().