Autobiographies or Portraits? Methodological Differences in Qualitative Social Research

Giordano Christian

Eastern European Countryside, 2018, vol. 24, issue 1, 25-42

Abstract: The author considers methodological differences in the use of autobiographies. However, while doing so, he does not focus on technical differences in the application of the method but asks about cognitive possibilities that come (or not) with certain methodological tools. It is through this perspective (epistemological capacity of theory and empirical knowledge) that the author discusses the difference between two very close and yet so separate methods of research: sociological autobiography and anthropological portrait. He refers to Florian Znaniecki’s methodological guidelines and juxtaposes them with other important sociological works. Analysing Znaniecki’s method, he finds elements that make it seem closer to anthropological portrait. This approach is to encourage the readers to look at the method in a different way – as something secondary to the accurate definition of the socio-cultural context for the studied phenomena.

Keywords: sociological autobiography; anthropological portrait; epistemology; Florian Znaniecki (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2018-0002 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:25-42:n:2

DOI: 10.2478/eec-2018-0002

Access Statistics for this article

Eastern European Countryside is currently edited by Andrzej Kaleta

More articles in Eastern European Countryside from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().