Evaluation of Digital Shadow Economy Prevention Measures
Remeikiene Rita () and
Gaspareniene Ligita ()
Additional contact information
Remeikiene Rita: Mykolo Romerio University, Lithuania
Gaspareniene Ligita: Mykolo Romerio University, Lithuania
Economics and Culture, 2016, vol. 13, issue 1, 31-40
Abstract:
Although during the past few years the scopes of shadow economy in Lithuania have slightly decreased, different forms of this phenomenon, in particular digital shadow activities, still generate a significant part of the overall value added. As no constant estimations of the scope of digital shadow economy have been made in Lithuania, alleviation of this problem is based on consequence fighting rather than reason elimination. Digital shadow economy poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies concerning its investigation and prevention. Hence, it is purposeful to research both theoretical and practical aspects of digital shadow economy prevention in order to identify the measures that could be used for the efficient reduction of the scope of this phenomenon. The aim of this research is to identify the measures of digital shadow economy prevention and compare the attitudes of governmental institutions and consumers towards the efficiency of these measures. The results of the empirical research showed that both consumers and experts agree that the level of tax morale has to be raised not only by using the measures of self-education but also by introducing long-term educational programmes; second, public authorities should ensure business friendly environment, actively implement the principles of justice and officially acknowledge and announce the concept of digital shadow economy; finally, for more efficient detection of the cases of digital shadow activities, it is necessary to reinforce current labour resources that should be specially trained to be able to disclose revenue hiding and tax evasion schemes, employed in e-trade.
Keywords: shadow economy; digital shadow economy; prevention measures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jec-2016-0004 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:31-40:n:4
DOI: 10.1515/jec-2016-0004
Access Statistics for this article
Economics and Culture is currently edited by Velga Vēvere
More articles in Economics and Culture from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().