A Comparative Analysis of Modern Performance Measurement and Management Models of Companies

Janjić Vesna (), Todorović Mirjana () and Jovanović Dejan ()
Additional contact information
Janjić Vesna: University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Serbia
Todorović Mirjana: University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Serbia
Jovanović Dejan: University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Serbia

Economic Themes, 2015, vol. 53, issue 2, 298-313

Abstract: Modern business conditions have led to the development of a large number of different models for strategic performance management, which view performance measurement through the prism of financial and non-financial indicators, from multiple perspectives. Strategic performance management models should enable efficient and effective management, i.e. an adequate response to continuous changes in the business environment. Theory and practice in this area suggest the development and implementation of various integrated frameworks (models) for performance management of companies, in order to achieve business excellence. In addition to the well-known integrated models, such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Performance Pyramid, SAILS model (Strategy Aligned Integrated Linked Scoring System), GRASP model (Goals-Resources-Actions-Structure-People), and others, Kanji’s Business Excellence Model (KBEM) and Kanji Business Scorecard (KBS) have been developed as well. Kanji’s model was created with the objective of eliminating the weaknesses and shortcomings of previous models, particularly the Balanced Scorecard. The application of multidimensional performance measures should increase the informational power of management in making strategic business decisions. The goal set by this paper is to consider some of the basic features of modern performance measurement and management models of companies that are represented in theory and applied in practice, and, on the basis of comparative analysis, to draw conclusions about their advantages and disadvantages.

Keywords: performance measurement and management models; Balanced Scorecard; SAILS model; GRASP model; Kanji’s model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2015-0017 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:53:y:2015:i:2:p:298-313:n:9

DOI: 10.1515/ethemes-2015-0017

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Themes is currently edited by Marija Radosavljević

More articles in Economic Themes from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().