Environmental values in the petrochemical industry: A Q-method study in South West Iran

Ghoochani Omid M., Bakhshi Azadeh, Cotton Matthew, Nejad Azar Hashemi and Ghanian Mansour ()
Additional contact information
Ghoochani Omid M.: Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran
Bakhshi Azadeh: Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran
Cotton Matthew: Department of Urban Studies and Planning, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Nejad Azar Hashemi: Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran
Ghanian Mansour: Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran

Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 2015, vol. 3, issue 4, 1-10

Abstract: Achieving sustainable development in different regional and cultural contexts is dependent, in part, upon an understanding of key actors’ underlying environmental, social and economic values. The social research technique called Q-methodology presents an effective means to explore such values as a matter of discourse: revealing the typologies of stakeholder perspectives within a given debate. Q-method involves factor analysis of participant rank-ordered preselected statements on a topic. The resultant factors are then reinterpreted as social discourses. In this study we use Q-methodology to explore the environmental values of Health Safety and Environmental (HSE) managers in petrochemical companies in Khuzestan province in southwest Iran. Khuzestan is a key region of petrochemical product development, with significant associated environmental pollution effects. Understanding HSE managers’ attitudes to environmental protection is of value in predicting broader environmental impacts to the region, given the relative importance of their role in regulating the environmental performance of this industry. Our results reveal four distinct and varied perspectives on environmental protection labelled: ‘Environmental stewardship’, ‘Environmental presentism’, ‘Technological optimism’ and ‘Enlightened anthropocentrism’. We then discuss how these four emergent perspectives correspond to broader environmental discourses as categorized by John Dryzek: i.e. green rationalism, economic rationalism, prometheanism and ecological modernization respectively.

Keywords: environmental values; petrochemicals; Q-methodology; sustainable development; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2015-0068 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:enviro:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:1-10:n:1

DOI: 10.1515/environ-2015-0068

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Socio-economic Studies is currently edited by Renata Dulias

More articles in Environmental & Socio-economic Studies from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().