EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How Consumers’ Styles of Thinking Can Control Brand Dilution

Monga Alokparna Basu () and Hsu Liwu ()
Additional contact information
Monga Alokparna Basu: Professor of Marketing, Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick, USA
Hsu Liwu: Assistant Professor of Marketing, College of Business, University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, 40-45

Abstract: Understanding consumers’ ways of thinking can help identify strategies to limit brand damage and elicit more favorable reactions from disapproving consumers. Analytic thinkers’ beliefs about a brand are diluted when they see negative information; those of holistic thinkers remain unaffected. While both analytic and holistic thinkers blame the brand equally for quality and manufacturing problems, holistic thinkers are more likely to blame contextual factors outside of the brand than analytic thinkers. This ability of holistic thinkers to focus on the outside context is the reason why their brand beliefs are not diluted. State-of-the-art crisis management should be proactive vis-à-vis potentially negative events. Crisis communications that highlight contextual factors as triggers of negative incidents offer a powerful mechanism to restrict brand damage. Additionally, elaborational messages that clarify the nature of the brand extension can curb negative thoughts from analytic consumers and boost their responses.

Keywords: Brand Dilution; Negative Publicity; Brand Extensions; Functional Brands; Luxury Brands; Analytic Thinking; Holistic Thinking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2018-0007 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:40-45:n:7

DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2018-0007

Access Statistics for this article

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli

More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:40-45:n:7