Metrics Gone Wrong: What Managers Can Learn from the 2016 US Presidential Election

Kübler Raoul () and Pauwels Koen ()
Additional contact information
Kübler Raoul: Junior Professor of Marketing, Marketing Center Münster, Germany
Pauwels Koen: Distinguished Professor of Marketing, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2021, vol. 13, issue 1, 30-35

Abstract: In the 2016 presidential election, the vast majority of available polls showed a comfortable lead for Hillary Clinton throughout the whole race, but in the end, she lost. Campaign managers could have known better, if they had had a closer look at other data sources and variables that – like polls – show voter engagement and preferences. In the political arena, donations, media coverage, social media followership, engagement and sentiment may similarly indicate how well a candidate is doing, and most of these variables are available for free. Validating the bigger picture with alternative data sources is not limited to politics. The latest marketing research shows that online-consumer-behavior metrics can enrich, and sometimes replace, traditional funnel metrics. Trusting a single ‘silver bullet’ metric does not just lead to surprises, it can also mislead managerial decision-making. Econometric models can help disentangle a complex web of dynamic interactions and show immediate and lagged effects of marketing or political events.

Keywords: Metrics; Dashboards; Decision-Making; Polls; Probabilistic Models; User-Generated Data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:30-35:n:5

DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005

Access Statistics for this article

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli

More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().