EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How Social Network and Opinion Leaders Affect the Adoption of New Products

Iyengar Raghuram (), Christophe Van den Bulte (), Eichert John () and West Bruce ()
Additional contact information
Iyengar Raghuram: Assistant Professor The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Christophe Van den Bulte: Assistant Professor The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Eichert John: Principal, Rivermark, Doylestown, PA, USA.
West Bruce: Principal, Rivermark, Doylestown, PA, USA.

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2011, vol. 3, issue 1, 16-25

Abstract: Do word-of-mouth and other peer influence processes really affect how quickly people adopt a new product? Can one identify the most influential customers and hence those who are good seeding points for a word-of-mouth marketing campaign? Can one also identify those customers most likely to be influenced by their peers? A pharmaceutical company seeking to improve its marketing effectiveness by leveraging social dynamics among physicians set out to answer these questions. There is indeed evidence of social influence, even after controlling for sales calls and individual characteristics. Also, people who are central in the network and those who use the product intensively are more influential. Finally, people who view themselves as opinion leaders are less affected by peer influence, whereas people who others really turn to for information or advice are not differentially affected. This last finding suggests that self-reported opinion leadership captures self-confidence, whereas a central position in the social network captures true leadership. Since sociometric techniques identify true opinion leaders more effectively than self-reports do, word-of-mouth programs targeting sociometric leaders are expected to be more effective than programs targeting self-reported leaders

Keywords: Word-of-Mouth; Opinion leadership; Social networks; Product Innovations; Network Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0052 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:16-25:n:3

DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0052

Access Statistics for this article

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli

More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:16-25:n:3