Line Extension Asymmetry: Higher Quality Line Extensions Help, Lower Quality Extensions Do Only a Little Harm

Heath Timothy B. (), DelVecchio Devon () and McCarthy Michael S. ()
Additional contact information
Heath Timothy B.: Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, HEC Paris, France
DelVecchio Devon: Associate and Full Professors respectively, Department of Marketing, Miami University. USA
McCarthy Michael S.: Associate and Full Professors respectively, Department of Marketing, Miami University. USA

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2013, vol. 5, issue 1, 31-37

Abstract: "Managers often extend brands to different quality levels. Adding lower priced variants is a particularly popular option for fighting the growing number of retailer brands. Such a move may increase sales, but it also risks diluting brand image. This study examines such line extensions by testing middle-quality brands that offer higher or lower quality line extensions. According to the results, the adverse effects of brands’ lower quality versions seem to be overestimated. Higher quality line extensions improved overall brand perception and evaluation far more than lower quality extensions damaged them. This asymmetry prevailed in multiple product classes and for various dimensions of brand evaluation such as brand attitude, brand expertise or brand innovation. In general, consumers seem to prefer broader product lines. Even if lower quality extensions reduced brand prestige, there was hardly any effect in the overall evaluation. The negative quality association was tempered by increased perceived brand innovation and positive variety effects. However, lower quality extensions are not harmless in every case. Managers are well advised to consider all branding options and to analyze possible effects, not only on the brand but also on the individual product. "

Keywords: Brand Management; Line Extensions; Product Lines; Brand Evaluations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0024 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:31-37:n:1006

DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0024

Access Statistics for this article

NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli

More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().