Product Seeding: Word-of-Mouth Effects For and Beyond the Focal Product
Bart Yakov ()
Additional contact information
Bart Yakov: Assistant Professor of Marketing, Northeastern University, sBoston, MA, USA
NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 2017, vol. 9, issue 2, 24-29
Abstract:
In a classic seeded WOM marketing campaign, a company sends product samples to a selected group of influencers, and encourages them share the product information and their own opinions with other consumers. Positive effects include more WOM for the focal product in the target segment, but also in additional segments. But there are additional spillover effects on the brand and the product category level and they are negative. More conversations about the focal product reduced the “off-topic” conversations about other brands in the same category as well as other products of the same brand. These negative brand and category spillover effects are stronger when the focal product is of a more functional nature. Marketers tend to consider only positive spillovers to be beneficial for a company, but negative spillovers should not be immediately classified as “bad news.” There are upsides to this effect that managers can use in their favor.
Keywords: WOM; Word-of-Mouth; Seeded Marketing Campaigns; Social Media; Spillover Effects; Viral Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0014 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:25-30:n:5
DOI: 10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0014
Access Statistics for this article
NIM Marketing Intelligence Review is currently edited by Christine Kittinger-Rosanelli
More articles in NIM Marketing Intelligence Review from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().