The Specificities of the Relationship of the Comparative and the Historical Methods in the Research of Political History
Tancic Dragan,
Elezovic Dalibor and
Gordić Miodrag
Additional contact information
Tancic Dragan: Institute of Serbian Culture Leposavic, Serbia
Elezovic Dalibor: The University of Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy, Mitrovica, Serbia
Gordić Miodrag: The University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2018, vol. 9, issue 2, 55-60
Abstract:
This paper discusses the issue of the specificities of the relationship of the comparative and the historical methods in the research of political history. We find examples of the relationship of the comparative and the historical methods in the research of political history in works of modern historiography. Contemporary political history studies various forms of political reality, a variety of themes and those subject to fad, like other branches of history. The analysis has shown that all general scientific methods, particularly the historical method, as well as the comparative method, enable the scientific cognition of social, historical and political phenomena and processes, which also applies to the research of political history.
Keywords: methodology; political history; comparative method; historical method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2018-0025 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:mjsosc:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:55-60:n:5
DOI: 10.2478/mjss-2018-0025
Access Statistics for this article
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences is currently edited by Alessandro Figus
More articles in Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().