The Nordic model: 25 years of drawing the line between earned and capital income in Finland

Knuutinen Reijo ()
Additional contact information
Knuutinen Reijo: Turku School of Economics at the University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Nordic Tax Journal, 2018, vol. 2018, issue 1, 64-80

Abstract: In personal income taxation, Finland had used the dualistic income tax model, known as the Nordic model, since 1993. The basic idea is that taxation of earned income is progressive, whereas taxation of capital income is proportional. Here, the model is reviewed from different perspectives: What kind of tax policy background does it have and how is the distinction between types of income argued for on theoretical grounds? How has the borderline of earned and capital income been drawn in tax legislation, and how is it drawn in the court cases, in particular in those related to tax avoidance? The dualistic model has often been criticized using equity arguments, but there are still strong arguments for the model. In any case, the model has not always worked too well in practice. The distinction has required special tax legislation as well as given rise to many court cases.

Keywords: Nordic model; dualistic income tax; differentiated tax system; earned income; capital income; tax avoidance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2018-0003 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:notajo:v:2018:y:2018:i:1:p:64-80:n:3

DOI: 10.1515/ntaxj-2018-0003

Access Statistics for this article

Nordic Tax Journal is currently edited by Axel Hilling

More articles in Nordic Tax Journal from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().