The Relative Impacts of Design Effects and Multiple Imputation on Variance Estimates: A Case Study with the 2008 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Lewis Taylor (), Goldberg Elizabeth, Schenker Nathaniel, Beresovsky Vladislav, Schappert Susan, Decker Sandra, Sonnenfeld Nancy and Shimizu Iris
Additional contact information
Lewis Taylor: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Goldberg Elizabeth: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Schenker Nathaniel: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Beresovsky Vladislav: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Schappert Susan: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Decker Sandra: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Sonnenfeld Nancy: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A
Shimizu Iris: National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A

Journal of Official Statistics, 2014, vol. 30, issue 1, 147-161

Abstract: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collects data on office-based physician care from a nationally representative, multistage sampling scheme where the ultimate unit of analysis is a patient-doctor encounter. Patient race, a commonly analyzed demographic, has been subject to a steadily increasing item nonresponse rate. In 1999, race was missing for 17 percent of cases; by 2008, that figure had risen to 33 percent. Over this entire period, single imputation has been the compensation method employed. Recent research at the National Center for Health Statistics evaluated multiply imputing race to better represent the missing-data uncertainty. Given item nonresponse rates of 30 percent or greater, we were surprised to find many estimates’ ratios of multiple-imputation to single-imputation estimated standard errors close to 1. A likely explanation is that the design effects attributable to the complex sample design largely outweigh any increase in variance attributable to missing-data uncertainty.

Keywords: Health survey; missing data; item nonresponse; fraction of missing information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0008 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:1:p:147-161:n:8

DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0008

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Official Statistics is currently edited by Annica Isaksson and Ingegerd Jansson

More articles in Journal of Official Statistics from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().