Sensitivity of Mixed-Source Statistics to Classification Errors
Burger Joep (),
Delden Arnout van () and
Scholtus Sander ()
Additional contact information
Burger Joep: Statistics Netherlands, Department of Process Development and Methodology, CBS-weg 11, P.O. Box 4481, 6401 CZ Heerlen, The Netherlands
Delden Arnout van: Statistics Netherlands, Department of Process Development and Methodology, Henri Faasdreef 312, P.O. Box 24500, 2490 HA The Hague, The Netherlands
Scholtus Sander: Statistics Netherlands, Department of Process Development and Methodology, Henri Faasdreef 312, P.O. Box 24500, 2490 HA The Hague, The Netherlands
Journal of Official Statistics, 2015, vol. 31, issue 3, 489-506
Abstract:
For policymakers and other users of official statistics, it is crucial to distinguish real differences underlying statistical outcomes from noise caused by various error sources in the statistical process. This has become more difficult as official statistics are increasingly based upon a mix of sources that typically do not involve probability sampling. In this article, we apply a resampling method to assess the sensitivity of mixed-source statistics to sourcespecific classification errors. Classification errors can be seen as coverage errors within a stratum. The method can be used to compare relative accuracies between strata and releases, it can assist in deciding how to optimally allocate resources in the statistical process, and it can be applied in evaluating potential estimators. A case study on short-term business statistics shows that bias occurs especially for those strata that deviate strongly from the mean value in other strata. It also suggests that shifting classification resources from small and mediumsized enterprises to large enterprises has virtually no net effect on accuracy, because the gain in precision is offset by the creation of bias. The resampling method can be extended to include other types of nonsampling error.
Keywords: Accuracy; coverage error; administrative data; short-term business statistics; bootstrap; resampling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0029 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:31:y:2015:i:3:p:489-506:n:9
DOI: 10.1515/jos-2015-0029
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Official Statistics is currently edited by Annica Isaksson and Ingegerd Jansson
More articles in Journal of Official Statistics from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().