Statistical Matching as a Supplement to Record Linkage: A Valuable Method to Tackle Nonconsent Bias?

Gessendorfer Jonathan (), Beste Jonas (), Drechsler Jörg () and Sakshaug Joseph W. ()
Additional contact information
Gessendorfer Jonathan: Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Str. 100, 90478Nuremberg, Germany.
Beste Jonas: Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Str. 100, 90478Nuremberg, Germany.
Drechsler Jörg: Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Str. 100, 90478Nuremberg, Germany.
Sakshaug Joseph W.: Institute for Employment Research, Regensburger Str. 100, 90478Nuremberg, Germany.

Journal of Official Statistics, 2018, vol. 34, issue 4, 909-933

Abstract: Record linkage has become an important tool for increasing research opportunities in the social sciences. Surveys that perform record linkage to administrative records are often required to obtain informed consent from respondents prior to linkage. A major concern is that nonconsent could introduce biases in analyses based on the linked data. One straightforward strategy to overcome the missing data problem created by nonconsent is to match nonconsenters with statistically similar units in the target administrative database. To assess the effectiveness of statistical matching in this context, we use data from two German panel surveys that have been linked to an administrative database of the German Federal Employment Agency. We evaluate the statistical matching procedure under various artificial nonconsent scenarios and show that the method can be effective in reducing nonconsent biases in marginal distributions, but that biases in multivariate estimates can sometimes be worsened. We discuss the implications of these findings for survey practice and elaborate on some of the practical challenges of implementing the statistical matching procedure in the context of linkage nonconsent. The developed simulation design can act as a roadmap for other statistical agencies considering the proposed approach for their data.

Keywords: Data fusion; survey data; administrative data; linkage nonconsent (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0045 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:34:y:2018:i:4:p:909-933:n:6

DOI: 10.2478/jos-2018-0045

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Official Statistics is currently edited by Annica Isaksson and Ingegerd Jansson

More articles in Journal of Official Statistics from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().