The Action Structure of Recruitment Calls and Its Analytic Implications: The Case of Disfluencies

Min Bo Hee (), Schaeffer Nora Cate (), Garbarski Dana () and Dykema Jennifer ()
Additional contact information
Min Bo Hee: Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Porcelænshaven 18B, 2000Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Schaeffer Nora Cate: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Sociology, 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A.
Garbarski Dana: Loyola University Chicago, Department of Sociology, 440 Coffey Hall, 1032 W. Sheridan Rd. Chicago, IL 60660, U.S.A.
Dykema Jennifer: University of Wisconsin Survey Center, 475 No. Charter Street, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A.

Journal of Official Statistics, 2020, vol. 36, issue 3, 529-559

Abstract: We describe interviewers’ actions in phone calls recruiting sample members. We illustrate (1) analytic challenges of studying how interviewers affect participation and (2) actions that undergird the variables in our models. We examine the impact of the interviewer’s disfluencies on whether a sample member accepts or declines the request for an interview as a case study. Disfluencies are potentially important if they communicate the competence or humanity of the interviewer to the sample member in a way that affects the decision to participate. Using the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, we find that although as they begin, calls that become declinations are similar to those that become acceptances, they soon take different paths. Considering all recruitment actions together, we find that the ratio of disfluencies to words does not predict acceptance of the request for an interview, although the disfluency ratio before the turning point – request to participate or a declination – of the call does. However, after controlling for the number of actions, the disfluency ratio no longer predicts participation. Instead, when we examine actions before and after the first turning point separately, we find that the number of actions has a positive relationship with participation before and a negative relationship after.

Keywords: Participation; nonresponse; disfluencies; recruitment; survey introduction; interviewer-respondent interaction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0028 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:36:y:2020:i:3:p:529-559:n:5

DOI: 10.2478/jos-2020-0028

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Official Statistics is currently edited by Annica Isaksson and Ingegerd Jansson

More articles in Journal of Official Statistics from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().