How Reliable Are Selected Methods Of Projections Of Future Thermal Conditions? A Case From Poland

Wibig Joanna () and Jędruszkiewicz Joanna
Additional contact information
Wibig Joanna: Department of Meteorology and Climatology, University of Łódź, Poland
Jędruszkiewicz Joanna: Institute of Geography, Pedagogical University, Kraków, Poland

Quaestiones Geographicae, 2015, vol. 34, issue 3, 151-160

Abstract: The aim of the paper was to assess the robustness of four bias correction techniques: simple bias correction, distribution based bias correction, delta change and distribution based delta change. Data from nine RCM simulations of CORDEX project and 41 Polish weather stations were used. The methods were calibrated in the period 1971–1985 and evaluated in 1991–2005. The improvement in mean, 10th and 90th percentiles was shown, without significant differences among methods. For 1st and 99th percentiles the improvement was generally weaker and simple methods seem to be more robust than the distribution based ones. Strong differences between individual models were found, so the use of model ensemble is recommended.

Keywords: bias correction; delta change; regional climate models; temperature; Poland (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2015-0025 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:34:y:2015:i:3:p:151-160:n:6

DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2015-0025

Access Statistics for this article

Quaestiones Geographicae is currently edited by Andrzej Kostrzewski

More articles in Quaestiones Geographicae from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().