Identifying the Most Effective Geosite Evaluation Models in Iran Using Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods
Ghasemi Moslem (),
Ghanavati Ezatollah and
Kazemi Jebrail
Additional contact information
Ghasemi Moslem: Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Ghanavati Ezatollah: Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Kazemi Jebrail: Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Quaestiones Geographicae, 2021, vol. 40, issue 3, 21-31
Abstract:
Despite the large amount of information, including books, articles and pristine images of geotourism, there exists no comprehensive study on the collection and classification of them in Iran yet. In this research, for the modelling of geosite watersheds, 1000 articles were surveyed through library research and the models with the highest frequency of use were identified and analysed among a statistical sample of 451 local papers using the Meta-Analysis method, and then the most efficient ones were identified using Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods. The results of this study showed that while the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT), Pralong, Reynard, AHP and Pereira models are in the first to fifth-ranked models with the highest frequency, however, Pralong, SWOT, Reynard, Perira and Comanescu models were considered as the most efficient ones in geosite modelling in Iran.
Keywords: geotourism; geosite; evaluation models; Delphi; AHP; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2021-0021 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:40:y:2021:i:3:p:21-31:n:8
DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2021-0021
Access Statistics for this article
Quaestiones Geographicae is currently edited by Andrzej Kostrzewski
More articles in Quaestiones Geographicae from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().