Hysteresis vs. Natural Rate of Unemployment: One, the Other, or Both?
Ferit Kula () and
Alper Aslan ()
South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 2010, vol. 5, issue 1, 91-94
This paper re-examines the empirical validity of the hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment rates by education level in 17 OECD countries. To this end, for an unbalanced panel, we employed Pesaran's Cross-Sectional Dependence (CD) and Cross-Sectionally Augmented ADF (CADF) tests. Our empirical findings provide evidence favorable to the non-stationarity of unemployment rates according to levels of primary and secondary education attainment in total unemployment, and therefore the existence of hysteresis for these levels of education. There is no evidence, however, of hysteresis for unemployment rates by tertiary education.
Keywords: Cross-Sectional Dependence; Hysteresis; Unit Root (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jeb.2010.5.issue- ... 009-0.xml?format=INT (text/html)
Working Paper: Hysteresis vs. natural rate of unemployment: One, the other, or both? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:seejeb:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:91-94:n:9
Access Statistics for this article
South East European Journal of Economics and Business is currently edited by Adnan Efendic, Vesna Babić-Hodović and Aziz Šunje
More articles in South East European Journal of Economics and Business from De Gruyter Open
Series data maintained by Peter Golla ().