On Asymmetry of Prediction Errors in Small Area Estimation

Żądło Tomasz ()
Additional contact information
Żądło Tomasz: University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Management, Katowice, Poland

Statistics in Transition New Series, 2017, vol. 18, issue 3, 413-432

Abstract: The mean squared error reflects only the average prediction accuracy while the distribution of squared prediction error is positively skewed. Hence, assessing or comparing accuracy based on the MSE (which is the mean of squared errors) is insufficient and even inadequate because we should be interested not only in the average but in the whole distribution of prediction errors. This is the reason why we propose to use different than MSE measures of prediction accuracy in small area estimation. In the prediction accuracy comparisons we take into account our proposal for the empirical best predictor, which is a generalization of the predictor presented by Molina and Rao (2010). The generalization results from the assumption of a longitudinal model and possible changes of the population and subpopulations in time.

Keywords: empirical best predictor; prediction errors; small area estimation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2016-078 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:18:y:2017:i:3:p:413-432:n:1

DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2016-078

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics in Transition New Series is currently edited by Włodzimierz Okrasa

More articles in Statistics in Transition New Series from Statistics Poland
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().