Konsens und Dissens in der evidenzbasierten Politikberatung

Garnadt Niklas

Wirtschaftsdienst, 2024, vol. 104, issue 1, 34-37

Abstract: Economic policy advice often reveals conflicting objectives. Using the example of the German Council of Economic Experts’ evidence-based policy advice, this article presents institutionalised procedures for consensus and dissent in the preparation of its annual report. While consensus is sought in the first two stages of primary data and data analysis, dissent regularly occurs in the third stage of reaching policy conclusions. Dissent is institutionalised through the possibility of authoring minority votes.

JEL-codes: A11 E30 E60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2024-0013 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:wirtsc:v:104:y:2024:i:1:p:34-37:n:13

DOI: 10.2478/wd-2024-0013

Access Statistics for this article

Wirtschaftsdienst is currently edited by Nicole Waidlein

More articles in Wirtschaftsdienst from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().