 Why Do So Few Preliminary Questions Come From Czechia?Kunertová Tereza () Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, 2024, vol. 14, issue 1, 69-94 Abstract: Although a substantial part of the body of laws of an EU Member State is founded upon European Union law and norms, the number of preliminary questions emanating from courts in the Czech Republic appears to be disproportionately low compared to other similar EU Member States. The aim of this article is to analyse and outline possible reasons for the lack of preliminary questions coming from the Czech Republic. In her analysis, the author identifies three possible factors underpinning the issue. These factors include attitudes towards the EU and a general lack of understanding of the relevance of EU laws and norms; the role of preliminary rulings; and the perception and recognition of courts. An integral part of this analysis is a critical commentary on the shifts in how courts and tribunals are perceived within the meaning of Art. 267 TFEU. Lastly, the author offers guidance to fellow legal professionals and academics for interpreting EU norms. Keywords: preliminary ruling; preliminary question; definition of court; Court of Justice of the European Union; direct effect; harmonious interpretation; primacy of EU law; Directive 2012/34/EU; railway sector (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:wrolae:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:69-94:n:1004 Access Statistics for this article Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics is currently edited by Artur Kozłowski More articles in Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics from Sciendo |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.