Impact of Agricultural Extension Services Access and Cooperative Membership on Farmers’ Welfare: Evidence From Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Tefera Ali (), Hadush Muuz (), Gebrehiwot Kidanemariam (), Hailu Alem () and Kahsay Shishay ()
Additional contact information
Tefera Ali: MA, Mekelle University, Department of Economics, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia
Hadush Muuz: PhD, Mekelle University, Department of Economics, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia
Gebrehiwot Kidanemariam: PhD, Mekelle University, Department of Economics, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia
Hailu Alem: MSc, Adigrat University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Adigrat, Tigray, Ethiopia
Kahsay Shishay: MSc, Adigrat University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Adigrat, Tigray, Ethiopia

Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, 2025, vol. 383, issue 2, 110-143

Abstract: Aim This study investigates the effects of agricultural extension services and cooperative membership on smallholder farmers’ welfare in Northern Ethiopia. Materials and Methods A sample of 392 households was selected from the Laelay Maichew district in Tigray, Ethiopia. A mixed-methods approach was used, including both qualitative and quantitative data collection. The study employed regression-adjusted and inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) models to estimate the impacts of extension services and cooperative membership on household welfare, focusing on income, expenditure, and asset ownership. Results The study found that access to extension services significantly increased farmers’ welfare, particularly in farm income and asset ownership, more so than cooperative membership. Participants in extension services spent ETB 13,903 more annually and had higher asset values compared to non-participants. Cooperative membership also had a positive effect, yet it was less substantial. The results suggest that while both interventions improve welfare, extension services have a greater impact. Conclusions Agricultural extension services are essential for improving farmers’ welfare by boosting income and asset ownership. While cooperative membership offers support, its impact is less significant. Policymakers should prioritize expanding access to extension services and rural financial markets to enhance agricultural productivity and improve smallholder livelihoods.

Keywords: impact evaluation; extension access; cooperatives; welfare; average treatment effect; ocena wpływu; dostęp do usług doradczych; spółdzielnie; dobrobyt; średni efekt oddziaływania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q14 Q16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/199956 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:vrs:zerpae:v:383:y:2025:i:2:p:110-143:n:1003

DOI: 10.30858/zer/199956

Access Statistics for this article

Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics is currently edited by Sylwia Łaba

More articles in Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics from Sciendo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().