Self-interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism

Avner Offer ()

Economic Thought, 2012, vol. 1, issue 2, 1

Abstract: Adam Smith rejected Mandeville's invisible-hand doctrine of 'private vices, publick benefits'. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments his model of the 'impartial spectator' is driven not by sympathy for other people, but by their approbation. The innate capacity for sympathy makes approbation credible. Approbation needs to be authenticated, and in Smith's model authentication relies on innate virtue, which is not realistic. An alternative model of 'regard' makes use of signalling and is more pragmatic. Modern versions of the invisible hand in rational choice theory and neo- liberalism are shown to be radical departures from the ethical legacy of Enlightenment and utilitarian economics, and are not consistent with Adam Smith's own position.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/sel ... -the-invisible-hand/ (text/html)
http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/WEA-ET-1-2-Offer.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Self-interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wea:econth:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:1

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Thought is currently edited by Kyla Rushman

More articles in Economic Thought from World Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake McMurchie ().