Consensus and Dissension among Economic Science Academics in Mexico

Jorge L. Andere (), Jorge Luis Canché-Escamilla and à lvaro Cano-Escalante
Additional contact information
Jorge L. Andere: Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica
Jorge Luis Canché-Escamilla: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán
à lvaro Cano-Escalante: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán Mexico

Economic Thought, 2020, vol. 9, issue 2, 1 - 23

Abstract: We report general and consensus results of a survey administered to a defined population of economic science academics in Mexico. Our results include insights on economic opinions, scientific aspects of economics, scientific activities, countries' economic performances and methodological orientation. Our outcomes show areas of consensus which, at least partially, are consistent with findings in previous studies. Comparisons between our results and those of other studies suggest that consensus could be constant over time and that economics academics in Mexico seems to show similar levels of skepticism about the importance of rationality assumption as those in other latitudes.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/con ... academics-in-mexico/ (text/html)
http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/2020/12/WEA-ET-9.2-Andere.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wea:econth:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:1

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Thought is currently edited by Kyla Rushman

More articles in Economic Thought from World Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake McMurchie ().