Deconstructing the Theory of Comparative Advantage
Reinhard Schumacher
World Economic Review, 2013, vol. 2013, issue 2, 83
Abstract:
This article critically examines the theory of comparative advantage, which underlies the wide-spread support of worldwide trade liberalisations. Both the classical and neoclassical formulations of it are shortly discussed and its essential assumptions are scrutinised. These include the international immobility of capital and labour, balanced trade, the existence of an adjustment mechanism which is responsible for the transformation of comparative production advantages into absolute price advantages, full employment and the perception of international trade as a static and harmonious phenomenon. It is shown that all these assumptions are neither theoretical valid nor do they coincide with empirical research. The whole rationale why international trade exists according this theory is deficient. The New Trade Theory, which claims to enhance the theory of comparative advantage, is unconvincing as a complement. It is concluded that the theory of comparative advantage should be dismissed. International trade theory, by relying on this theory, risks ignoring the most relevant and important elements with regard to international trade. The deficiencies of the theory of comparative advantage are especially crucial for trade policies that are derived from this theory, which is discussed with reference to the WTO and its ongoing Doha Round. View the Open Peer Discussion of this paper »
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://wer.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/de ... mparative-advantage/ (text/html)
http://wer.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/WEA-WER2-Schumacher.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wea:worler:v:2013:y:2013:i:2:p:83
Access Statistics for this article
World Economic Review is currently edited by Kyla Rushman
More articles in World Economic Review from World Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jake McMurchie ().