Structural Reform, IMF Conditionality and the ‘Goldilocks Problem'

Graham Bird

World Economics, 2020, vol. 21, issue 3, 155-182

Abstract: Recent empirical research suggests that structural reform has a significant positive effect on future economic growth. Following the proliferation of structural conditionality in IMF programmes in the 1980s and 1990s, the ‘streamlining' initiative begun in the early 2000s envisaged a more parsimonious approach designed to increase ‘ownership' and improve programme implementation. However, there is a potential ‘Goldilocks problem'. While structural conditionality can be too ‘hard', it can also be too ‘soft'. When is it just right? Empirical evidence on the political economy of structural reform may provide clues to how IMF conditionality could be designed to strengthen its impact on economic growth.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.worldeconomics.com/Journal/Papers/Article.details?ID=810 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wej:wldecn:810

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in World Economics from World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ed Jones ().