 Avoiding Accounting Fixation: Determinants of Cognitive Adaptation to Differences in Accounting Method*David T. Dearman and Michael D. Shields Contemporary Accounting Research, 2005, vol. 22, issue 2, 351-384 Abstract: Much research over the last 30 years has provided evidence that individuals display accounting fixation; that is, their cognitive process does not appropriately adapt to cross†sectional or temporal differences in an accounting method. This paper presents the results of a quasi†experimental test of the hypothesis that cognitive adaptation to a change in accounting method is an ordinal interactive function of three person characteristics: relevant accounting knowledge, general problem†solving ability, and intrinsic motivation to appropriately engage in the decision task. Based on a product†pricing decision task in which participants are provided with product costs reported by two generally employed product†costing methods (activity†based costing [ABC] and volume†based costing), the results show that the majority of participants did not change their cognitive behavior when there was a change in the costing method. Further, those participants who did adapt to the change in accounting method, and thus avoided accounting fixation, did so by debiasing costs reported by volume†based costing but not by ABC. Finally, these adapters generally exhibited high values for all three of the person characteristics compared with those who did not adapt. Date: 2005 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:coacre:v:22:y:2005:i:2:p:351-384 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Contemporary Accounting Research from John Wiley & Sons |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.